ADKAR Model: Key Concepts & What You Need to Know

Organizations don't change—people do, one person at a time. That's the fundamental insight behind the ADKAR Model, which breaks organizational transformation into its individual components and provides a diagnostic framework to identify exactly where each person is stuck in their change journey. Understanding ADKAR explains why 70% of change initiatives fail: not because the change itself was wrong, but because the human journey through change was incomplete.

This guide breaks down the five sequential elements of ADKAR—Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement—and shows you how to diagnose barrier points, sequence interventions correctly, and avoid the common mistakes that derail change efforts. You'll understand why training without desire creates cynical participants, why knowledge doesn't equal ability, and why even successful changes erode without proper reinforcement.

Start practicing ADKAR concepts ▸

What are the five elements of ADKAR and why must they occur in sequence?

ADKAR's five elements—Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement—must occur sequentially because each builds on the previous. You can't desire what you're not aware of, can't learn what you don't want to do, can't perform what you don't know how to do, and can't sustain what you can't actually perform. This sequence isn't arbitrary—it reflects how humans actually change.

The sequential nature provides both a roadmap for change and a diagnostic tool for identifying where people get stuck. Trying to train someone who doesn't want to change creates resistance and wastes resources. Attempting to reinforce behaviors that people can't actually perform leads to frustration and failure. When change efforts stall, the ADKAR sequence pinpoints exactly which element is incomplete.

Breaking the sequence creates predictable failure patterns

Organizations often rush through elements or skip them entirely, assuming that announcing change creates awareness or that training automatically creates ability. Training without desire produces reluctant participants who won't apply learning. Expecting performance without providing knowledge leaves people guessing at requirements. Each skipped element becomes a point where change efforts collapse—and understanding these patterns helps leaders diagnose why their initiatives aren't working.

What does Awareness mean in ADKAR and how do you build it?

Awareness means understanding why change is necessary—the business drivers, competitive threats, customer demands, and personal implications—not just knowing that change is happening. Understanding 'why' creates the foundation for personal buy-in, while merely knowing 'what' often triggers resistance.

True awareness goes beyond announcement emails or town halls declaring change. It requires people to internalize the rationale—understanding how market forces, customer feedback, or competitive pressures make change essential for survival. Without this deeper understanding of 'why,' people may comply superficially but won't engage emotionally or intellectually with the change process.

Awareness activities focus on objective facts

Building awareness requires executives to communicate business drivers through multiple channels—competitive analysis showing market threats, customer feedback demanding change, financial data showing unsustainable trends. The goal is making the consequence of not changing more vivid than abstract strategic plans. Showing actual customer defection rates, competitor innovations, or declining market share makes status quo scarier than change by demonstrating real, immediate threats.

Practice ADKAR for free ▸

What is Desire in ADKAR and why can't it be mandated?

Desire represents personal choice to support and participate in change, driven by answering 'What's In It For Me?' (WIIFM). People need to see personal benefit, reduced pain, or alignment with their values before they'll genuinely engage rather than merely comply. Desire can't be mandated through policy or authority—it emerges when individuals see how change benefits them personally.

Building desire requires addressing both organizational factors (culture, history with change, peer influence) and personal factors (individual situation, career stage, risk tolerance). A single approach rarely works because people's motivations vary based on their unique circumstances and past experiences. Someone nearing retirement has different motivations than a new graduate; someone who survived previous layoffs views change differently than someone who benefited from past transformations.

Desire-building requires personal engagement

While awareness can be built through mass communication, desire emerges through personal connection. One-on-one conversations address individual concerns. Involving skeptics in solution design often converts them to supporters because they see their expertise respected and their concerns addressed. Having respected peers—not just executives—share their personal commitment to change resonates more than corporate messaging about strategic imperatives.

Creating awareness without desire produces informed resistance

This is the danger of over-communicating facts while under-engaging emotions. Employees might fully grasp market pressures and competitive threats but still resist if they believe change threatens their expertise, status, or job security. These informed resisters often become the most challenging because they can articulate sophisticated objections grounded in the very data meant to persuade them.

Understanding ADKAR concepts is one thing—remembering them when you're leading change is another.
Loxie uses spaced repetition to help you internalize the five elements, diagnostic questions, and intervention strategies so they're available when you need them, not just during reading.

Try Loxie for free ▸

How does Knowledge differ from Ability in the ADKAR Model?

Knowledge in ADKAR encompasses both conceptual understanding (what needs to change and why) and procedural knowledge (specific steps, tools, and processes). Ability means demonstrated capability to perform new behaviors at the required performance level—not just understanding intellectually but actually executing successfully in real work conditions with real constraints, pressures, and complexities.

The gap between knowing and doing is where many changes fail. Someone might understand a new sales process perfectly in training but struggle to execute it during a high-pressure client meeting. Ability develops through supervised practice, gradual complexity increase, and removing barriers that prevent application—it's the difference between passing a driving test and navigating rush hour traffic.

Knowledge transfer requires multiple methods

Effective knowledge transfer combines formal training for systematic learning, job aids for reference during work, mentoring for nuanced understanding, and clear documentation for consistency. The goal isn't just information transfer but ensuring people understand both what they need to do differently and exactly how to do it in their specific role.

Ability development requires five supports beyond training

Building ability requires practice opportunities to build muscle memory, coaching feedback to correct errors early, adequate time to reach proficiency without performance penalties, proper tools and resources, and removal of organizational barriers that prevent application. Without these supports, people revert to old methods under pressure rather than risk failure with partially-developed new skills.

Download Loxie for free ▸

What is Reinforcement and why do 60-70% of changes fail without it?

Reinforcement sustains change by making new behaviors easier to maintain than reverting to old patterns through four mechanisms: recognition (celebrating success), accountability (measuring compliance), structural changes (removing old options), and continuous improvement (refining based on feedback). Without reinforcement, even successful changes erode over time as people drift back to familiar patterns under stress.

The regression statistics are sobering: 60-70% of initially successful changes fail within two years. Changes that seem successful after training often disappear within months. People revert not from rebellion but from human nature—old habits reassert themselves under stress. Reinforcement mechanisms counteract this drift by maintaining focus, providing support during difficult periods, and making the new way easier than the old way through environmental design.

Structural reinforcement creates permanent change

The most sustainable reinforcement changes the environment rather than relying on individual discipline. Removing old software forces use of new systems. Redesigning workspaces enables new collaboration patterns. Changing approval workflows embeds new decision rights. These structural changes work automatically, sustaining new behaviors even when people are stressed, tired, or facing pressure to revert—solving the willpower problem by eliminating the option to revert.

How do you identify someone's barrier point in their change journey?

The barrier point—the first ADKAR element where someone scores below 3 on a 5-point scale—identifies exactly where they're stuck. Fixing later elements without addressing this barrier wastes resources because the chain breaks at its weakest link. Like a production line that stops at the first broken machine, individual change halts at the first incomplete ADKAR element.

Diagnosing barrier points requires asking five targeted questions in sequence: 'Do they understand why we must change?' (Awareness), 'Do they want to support it?' (Desire), 'Do they know how to change?' (Knowledge), 'Can they actually do it?' (Ability), 'Will it stick long-term?' (Reinforcement). Each 'no' answer identifies a specific barrier requiring different interventions.

Common diagnostic mistakes

Leaders often assume all resistance stems from lack of desire (when it might be confusion about why change is needed), or provide more training when the real barrier is ability—people know what to do but lack tools, time, or environmental support to actually do it. When interventions don't match actual barriers, people recognize the disconnect: cheerleading sessions for teams that don't understand why change is necessary feel hollow, and skill training for people who fundamentally oppose the change breeds resentment.

ADKAR assessment quantifies readiness

Scoring each ADKAR element (typically 1-5 scale) creates an objective change readiness profile: scores of 4-5 indicate strength, 3 represents minimal acceptability, and below 3 signals a barrier requiring intervention. Rather than labeling someone as 'resistant,' ADKAR scoring might reveal they have high Awareness (5) and Knowledge (4) but low Desire (2)—they understand perfectly but don't want to change. This precision enables targeted interventions: they don't need more communication or training, they need personal engagement addressing their specific concerns and motivations.

Start retaining what you learn ▸

How do you sequence change activities using ADKAR?

Change activity sequencing follows ADKAR order: first communicate why change is necessary (awareness), then engage personally to build support (desire), then provide education (knowledge), then enable practice and application (ability), and finally sustain through recognition and accountability (reinforcement). This sequence reflects how humans actually change rather than how organizations wish they would change.

Sequential building requires achieving threshold scores (typically 3+ on a 5-point scale) for each ADKAR element before emphasizing the next. Attempting knowledge training before building desire wastes resources on reluctant participants who won't apply learning. Like building a house requiring foundation before walls, change requires completing each element before progressing.

Different stakeholder groups face different barriers

Position in the organization shapes change experience. Senior leaders who designed the strategy naturally have high awareness and desire but often struggle with reinforcement (reverting under quarterly pressure). Middle managers juggling implementation might have awareness but lack desire seeing only increased workload without authority. Frontline workers might have neither, hearing about change third-hand without context. These different starting points require different interventions for each group.

Parallel processing accelerates change

Smart sequencing doesn't mean everyone moves together. While completing awareness activities for the full organization, begin desire-building with early adopters. While they develop knowledge, the next wave builds desire. These pioneers become proof points and coaches for later groups, creating a rolling wave rather than lockstep progression that maintains momentum while respecting the sequential requirements for each individual.

The real challenge with learning ADKAR

Reading about ADKAR is easy. Remembering the five elements, the diagnostic questions, the intervention strategies, and the common mistakes when you're actually leading a change initiative—that's the hard part. The forgetting curve is relentless: within a week, you'll have lost most of what you just learned. Within a month, it's almost gone.

How much of what you just read will you remember the next time you need to diagnose why a change effort is stalling? Will you recall the difference between awareness and desire interventions? The five supports required for ability development? The four reinforcement mechanisms? Understanding ADKAR intellectually and having it available when you need it are very different things.

How Loxie helps you actually remember ADKAR

Loxie uses spaced repetition and active recall to help you retain the ADKAR framework permanently. Instead of reading once and forgetting, you practice for 2 minutes a day with questions that resurface the five elements, diagnostic questions, and intervention strategies right before you'd naturally forget them. The science is clear: active recall beats passive review by 3-5x for long-term retention.

The free version includes ADKAR concepts in its full topic library, so you can start reinforcing these ideas immediately. When you're leading your next change initiative, the ADKAR framework will be there—not as something you vaguely remember reading about, but as knowledge you can actually apply.

Sign up free and start retaining ▸