MEDDIC/MEDDPICC: Key Concepts & What You Need to Know
Master the enterprise sales qualification framework that separates deals worth pursuing from opportunities that were never going to close.
by The Loxie Learning Team
Most enterprise salespeople lose deals not because they pitched poorly, but because they invested months in opportunities that were never going to close. MEDDIC/MEDDPICC is the qualification framework that transformed enterprise sales from relationship-based art into rigorous science—teaching you to systematically assess deal viability so you invest time in opportunities that will close rather than chasing prospects who were never going to buy.
This guide breaks down the essential elements of MEDDIC qualification. You'll learn what each letter stands for and why it matters, how to score qualification strength objectively rather than optimistically, and when to walk away from deals that look promising but lack fundamental requirements for closing. Whether you're new to enterprise sales or looking to sharpen your qualification discipline, understanding MEDDIC changes how you evaluate every opportunity in your pipeline.
What are the six elements of MEDDIC qualification?
MEDDIC uses six elements to systematically assess deal viability: Metrics (quantified business impact), Economic Buyer (the person with budget authority), Decision Criteria (how they'll evaluate options), Decision Process (steps and timeline to purchase), Identify Pain (the compelling reason to act), and Champion (your internal advocate who sells when you're not there). Each element serves as a potential deal killer if absent or weak.
The framework transforms qualification from gut feel to objective assessment. Without Metrics, value discussions remain abstract and budgets don't get approved. Without Economic Buyer access, you're selling to people who can't sign contracts. Without understanding Decision Process, surprises derail deals late. Many "promising" opportunities lack fundamental requirements for closing—MEDDIC reveals that truth before you waste months pursuing them.
How does MEDDPICC expand the framework?
MEDDPICC adds two additional elements for complex enterprise deals: Paper Process (procurement and legal realities) and Competition (who else they're considering). These additions recognize that administrative requirements can add 3-6 months to deals when discovered late, and that understanding all alternatives—not just direct competitors—is essential for positioning your solution effectively.
How do you score MEDDIC elements objectively?
Qualification scoring assigns objective strength levels to each MEDDIC element—strong, developing, weak, or absent—rather than binary yes/no assessments. This granularity reveals specific areas needing improvement rather than false confidence from checkboxes. "Has budget" ignores whether it's approved, allocated, or merely discussed. "Has Champion" doesn't distinguish between someone actively selling internally versus someone who just likes your product.
Strength-based scoring forces nuanced assessment: Is your Champion actively selling internally and arranging executive meetings (strong) or just providing information when asked (weak)? Are Metrics validated by the customer through collaborative calculation (strong) or just your estimates based on industry averages (developing)? This objectivity drives better coaching conversations and resource allocation decisions. Loxie helps you internalize these distinctions so you can assess qualification strength instinctively rather than consulting checklists during every deal review.
Practice qualification scoring ▸
What makes Metrics effective in MEDDIC?
Metrics must translate your solution's capabilities into the customer's business language. Converting "reduces processing time by 50%" into "saves your team 20 hours weekly, worth $400K annually in freed capacity for revenue-generating activities" creates the specificity executives need for investment decisions. Generic metrics like "improves efficiency" or "reduces costs" lack the concrete impact that gets budgets approved.
Effective metric validation requires customer confirmation through collaborative calculation. Have them provide the inputs, verify the math, and agree to the projected outcome. Metrics they help create carry more weight internally than metrics you present to them. When the CFO questions ROI during budget approval, your Champion can defend calculations they participated in building—transforming your sales claims into shared business truth.
What are the three components of customer-specific metrics?
Customer-specific metrics require three components: baseline measurement (current state performance), improvement projection (expected future state), and value calculation method (how improvement translates to dollars). Without all three, metrics remain vendor claims rather than business case foundations. "You currently spend X hours on Y process, costing Z dollars. Our solution reduces this to A hours, saving B dollars annually." Each component must be validated with the customer.
How do you identify the true Economic Buyer?
Economic Buyers possess discretionary budget authority to approve purchases independently. They can write checks without permission, have signing authority for your deal size, and a history of independent purchasing decisions. Test for true authority by asking "What's your approval limit?" and "Have you bought similar solutions without escalation?" Many stakeholders claim decision authority but actually need someone else's signature.
When prospects claim Economic Buyer status but show hesitation about budget details or approval processes, the phrase "Help me understand how budget works in your organization" creates safe space for truth. People will clarify their actual role rather than maintain false authority when given an educational frame. They'll often volunteer limitations: "Well, technically I need VP approval for anything over $50K." This truth enables proper stakeholder mapping without damaging the relationship.
The MEDDIC elements interconnect—weakness in one undermines others
Lacking a Champion makes reaching the Economic Buyer nearly impossible. Missing Metrics prevents the Champion from building an internal business case. These interdependencies mean deals with 4 of 6 elements still fail because the missing pieces prevent the present ones from functioning. Loxie helps you internalize how these elements work together so you spot gaps before they kill deals.
Master MEDDIC connections ▸What's the difference between formal and informal Decision Criteria?
Decision Criteria include formal requirements (RFP specifications, compliance needs, technical standards) and informal preferences (ease of use, vendor reputation, cultural fit). Official criteria create the shortlist, but informal preferences often determine the winner. While RFPs focus on features and price, selection committees discuss implementation difficulty, vendor responsiveness, and user adoption likelihood.
Uncovering informal criteria requires deeper conversations, often through your Champion. Ask "Beyond the RFP, what would make one solution better than another for your team?" Each stakeholder group brings different criteria that may not appear in formal requirements—IT values security and integration ease, finance focuses on TCO and payment terms, end users want intuitive interfaces. Understanding all criteria, then determining which ones the Economic Buyer prioritizes, enables targeted positioning that addresses what actually drives decisions.
How do you shape Decision Criteria in your favor?
Shaping Decision Criteria early means introducing evaluation factors that favor your strengths before requirements solidify. Suggest "time to value" as a criterion when you implement fastest, or "proven scale" when you have the most enterprise deployments. Once criteria are documented in RFPs or evaluation matrices, they're locked. Early influence when criteria are forming is your only window—positioned as helpful guidance, not self-serving manipulation.
Why is mapping the Decision Process critical?
Decision Process mapping requires identifying every approval step, committee review, and sign-off required to close the deal. Discover this by asking "Walk me through what happens after you decide we're the right solution." Sellers often stop discovery at "Who makes the decision?" without understanding the full journey. After selection comes budget approval, legal review, security assessment, board notification, and implementation planning—each step can add weeks or months.
Timeline validation tests whether dates are real by asking about consequences of delays. "What happens if this slips to next quarter?" reveals whether timing is critical (regulatory deadline, budget expiration) or aspirational (nice to have by then). Real deadlines have real consequences and create predictable urgency. Soft timelines slip repeatedly as other priorities emerge. Understanding process complexity early enables parallel processing strategies rather than discovering sequential dependencies at the finish line.
Practice Decision Process questions ▸
What makes Pain compelling enough to drive action?
Compelling pain combines measurable business impact with time sensitivity. Problems costing $2M annually with a regulatory deadline create urgency that generates budget. Vague "inefficiency" without quantification or timeline generates no action because organizations only change when staying the same becomes more expensive than changing. Pain must hurt enough to overcome organizational inertia.
Status quo cost calculation quantifies the price of inaction—including lost revenue, competitive disadvantage, employee turnover, and opportunity cost. Making "do nothing" an expensive decision rather than a free option reframes the purchase from expense to investment. Calculate what problems cost daily: lost sales, overtime hours, customer churn, delayed product launches. Add opportunity costs: what could employees do if not fighting fires? This total often dramatically exceeds solution cost.
How do you amplify and validate pain?
Pain amplification techniques help prospects feel the true cost of problems. Ask "What happens if this problem doubles next year?" or "How does this affect your team's morale?" to expand impact beyond immediate symptoms to downstream consequences. Pain validation requires confirmation from multiple stakeholders because one person's crisis might be another's acceptable trade-off. Testing pain across stakeholder groups reveals whether you have an organizational problem or individual complaint.
What separates a true Champion from a friendly contact?
Champions require three qualifications: power to influence decisions, a personal win tied to your success, and willingness to actively sell internally. Identify true Champions by their ability to secure meetings with executives, share internal intelligence about competitors and processes, and push back on unfavorable requirements. Many sellers mistake friendly contacts for Champions, but supporters without power or motivation aren't true Champions—they're coaches who are helpful but passive.
Champion testing involves requesting specific actions that require risk and political capital. "Can you introduce me to the Economic Buyer?" tests their access. "Would you share the internal evaluation spreadsheet?" tests their investment. "Can you push back on that requirement?" tests their willingness to advocate. Talk is cheap; actions reveal true Champions. These tests should escalate gradually to build trust while proving capability—if they can't or won't take action, they're not Champions regardless of what they say.
How do you enable Champions to sell internally?
Champion enablement provides tools for internal selling—executive presentation decks, ROI calculators, objection handling guides, competitive comparisons—formatted for their use without you present. Champions need ammunition for battles you can't fight in closed-door meetings where decisions actually get made. Champion coaching sessions prepare them for specific internal conversations through role-playing objections, crafting messages for different stakeholders, and strategizing meeting approaches.
What does Paper Process cover in MEDDPICC?
Paper Process encompasses procurement procedures, legal review cycles, security assessments, vendor onboarding, and compliance requirements. Discover these early by asking "Walk me through your vendor approval process." These administrative requirements can add 3-6 months to deals when discovered late—procurement might require vendor registration and insurance certificates, legal needs master agreements and liability negotiations, security demands audits and questionnaires.
Master agreements, NDAs, and security questionnaires should run parallel with the sales process rather than sequentially after selection. Start administrative processes during evaluation: submit for vendor approval while demonstrating value, complete security questionnaires during proof of concept, negotiate legal terms while building the business case. This parallelization can reduce time-to-contract by 50% or more compared to sequential processing.
How do you assess Competition in MEDDPICC?
Competition includes direct competitors selling similar solutions, internal build options using existing resources, and the status quo of living with the current state. Each requires different counterstrategies because technical superiority over competitors doesn't address "build versus buy" decisions or organizational inertia. Status quo is often the strongest competitor because it requires no decision, no budget, and no risk.
Competitive intelligence gathering through indirect questions—"What criteria are most important?", "What concerns do you have?", "What have you seen work well elsewhere?"—reveals competitor positioning without asking directly. Criteria emphasis shows competitor strengths they're valuing, concerns reveal competitor weaknesses they've noticed, and reference requests indicate solutions they're considering. This intelligence enables targeted positioning without appearing defensive about competition.
What red flag patterns predict deal failure?
Certain MEDDIC gap combinations create near-certain failure regardless of effort. No Economic Buyer plus no Champion means you're selling to people who can't buy and have nobody advocating internally. No Metrics plus no Pain indicates a solution looking for a problem rather than solving urgent business needs. Recognizing these patterns early prevents wasting months on deals that were never viable.
Disqualification triggers include no Economic Buyer access after three attempts, no quantifiable pain despite discovery efforts, or refusal to share Decision Process. These patterns indicate structural problems rather than execution issues. Information asymmetry—where prospects demand proposals, references, and demos while refusing to share budget, timeline, or evaluation criteria—signals they're using you for free consulting or price benchmarking rather than genuine evaluation.
How do you distinguish fixable gaps from structural flaws?
Gap severity analysis distinguishes fixable gaps from structural flaws. Haven't met Economic Buyer yet is fixable through Champion introduction. Weak Metrics improve through value workshops. But no budget exists, no pain can be quantified, or wrong Decision Criteria might be unfixable—requiring pivot strategies like repositioning the solution, finding a different buyer, or disqualifying the opportunity entirely. The best salespeople have the highest disqualification rates because they quickly filter to winnable opportunities.
How do you run effective MEDDIC deal reviews?
MEDDIC deal reviews systematically examine each element requiring evidence, not assumptions. Transform "I think they have budget" into "CFO confirmed $200K allocated in Q3 budget." Not "good champion" but "arranged three executive meetings and pushed back on procurement terms." Evidence hierarchy distinguishes strong proof from weak indicators—written confirmation beats verbal agreement, specific dates beat general timelines, demonstrated behavior beats stated intentions.
Gap assessment creates objective qualification scorecards that reveal whether you have a qualified opportunity or hopeful thinking that wastes resources. This objectivity often reveals that "hot" deals might be lukewarm while "stuck" deals just need specific gaps addressed. Resource allocation should weight MEDDIC completeness—opportunities with 5-6 strong elements deserve maximum effort while those with 2-3 weak elements get minimal investment or disqualification.
Master deal review techniques ▸
The real challenge with learning MEDDIC/MEDDPICC
MEDDIC seems straightforward when you read about it—six elements, clear definitions, logical framework. The challenge is that qualification happens in real-time during conversations with prospects, and you can't pause to consult a reference guide. By the time you realize you should have asked about Decision Process or tested for true Economic Buyer authority, the moment has passed.
Research on learning and memory shows that reading about concepts once leads to forgetting 70% within a week. How many qualification frameworks have you studied that didn't change how you actually sell? Understanding MEDDIC intellectually and applying it instinctively during discovery calls are entirely different capabilities.
How Loxie helps you actually remember MEDDIC
Loxie uses spaced repetition and active recall to move MEDDIC from intellectual knowledge to instinctive application. Instead of reading once and hoping the framework sticks, you practice for 2 minutes a day with questions that resurface concepts right before you'd naturally forget them—the Champion testing questions, the Economic Buyer validation techniques, the red flag patterns that predict deal failure.
The goal isn't memorizing definitions but building the pattern recognition that lets you spot qualification gaps in real-time. When a prospect claims budget authority, you'll instinctively ask the testing questions. When deals stall, you'll immediately assess which MEDDIC elements are weak. Loxie's free version includes MEDDIC/MEDDPICC in its full topic library, so you can start reinforcing these qualification skills immediately.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MEDDIC in sales?
MEDDIC is a sales qualification framework using six elements to assess deal viability: Metrics (quantified business impact), Economic Buyer (budget authority), Decision Criteria (evaluation requirements), Decision Process (approval steps), Identify Pain (compelling reason to act), and Champion (internal advocate). It transforms qualification from gut feel into systematic assessment.
What's the difference between MEDDIC and MEDDPICC?
MEDDPICC expands MEDDIC by adding two elements for complex enterprise deals: Paper Process (procurement, legal, and administrative requirements) and Competition (direct competitors, internal build options, and status quo). These additions address realities that can add months to deals when discovered late.
What makes someone a true Champion in MEDDIC?
True Champions have three qualifications: power to influence decisions, a personal win tied to your success, and willingness to actively sell internally. Test for genuine championship by requesting specific actions—arranging executive meetings, sharing internal information, pushing back on requirements. Supporters who won't take risks aren't Champions.
How do you identify the Economic Buyer?
Economic Buyers have discretionary budget authority to approve purchases independently. Test for true authority by asking about approval limits and past purchasing decisions. If they need anyone else's signature, they're not the Economic Buyer. The question "Help me understand how budget works in your organization" creates safe space for honest answers.
When should you disqualify a deal using MEDDIC?
Disqualify when you see structural problems rather than execution issues: no Economic Buyer access after three attempts, no quantifiable pain despite discovery efforts, or refusal to share Decision Process. Also disqualify when information flow is one-way—they take proposals and demos but won't share budget or timeline.
How can Loxie help me learn MEDDIC/MEDDPICC?
Loxie uses spaced repetition and active recall to move MEDDIC from intellectual knowledge to instinctive application. Instead of reading once and forgetting, you practice for 2 minutes a day with questions that resurface qualification techniques right before you'd naturally forget them. The free version includes MEDDIC in its full topic library.
Stop forgetting what you learn.
Join the Loxie beta and start learning for good.
Free early access · No credit card required


